2 replies »

1. ГОСПОДИНЕ ЂЕНЕРАЛЕ ТВОЈИ СРБИ ЗАГОРАНИ СЕ ВАЗДА БОГУ МОЛЕ ДА ТИ ПОМОГНЕ ДА ДОДЂЕШ У НАШУ СРБСКУ РЕПУБЛИКУ НИЈЕСИ ТИ НИШТА КРИВ БЕОГРАДСКИ режим ЈЕ ТЕБЕ ПРЕДАО ТОМ хагу ИСТО КА БРАТА РАДОВАНА КАРАЏИЋА И СВЕ НАШЕ ВИТЕЗОВЕ КОЈИ СУ У ТОМ ПРОКЛЕТОМ хагу НЕ ОСТАЛО ТИ хагу ни КАМЕНА НИ ЗИДА ЗБОГ ТВОЈЕ ПРЉАВЕ ИГРЕ ЂЕ НЕДУЖНИ РОБУЈУ ЗАР СЕ БОГА НЕ БОЈИШ И НЕМАШ СТИДА белосветска крвопијо БОГ ТЕ КАЗНИЈО И И ТАКО ТИ ОН СУДИЈО ПРОКЛЕТИ латини и чифути СРБИ ЋЕ ТО СВЕ ПОВРАТИТИ А БОГ ЋЕ СВЕ СРБСКО СЛОБОДОМ СРБСКОМ ПОЗЛАТИТИ

   Свиђа ми сеСвиђа ми се

2. Zbog čega za Mladićevi i Karažićevi advokati nisu predložili da se kao svedok odbrane u dokaznom postupku protiv njihovih branjenika pojavi jedan od najkredibilnijih svedoka, novozelandski obaveštajni ekspert Gregory R Copley koji je jedno vreme tokom rata u BIH u Sarajevu rukovodio Geostrateškim institutom – (GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily)? Koplej je je o ratu u BiH i svojim ličnim zapažanjima u Sarajevu u svojim knjigama koje je izdao, izneo niz istinitih činjenica kojima pobija navode Tužilaštva haškog kazamata.

   Začuđujuće je što na više skupova koji su ranije održavani u Banjaluci na temu Srebrenice i suđenjima glavnim optuženicima – prvom predsedniku Republike Srpske Radovanu Karažiću i načelniku Glavnog štaba VRS generalu Ratku Mladiću od strane pravnih eksperata niko ni jednom nije pomenuo ime GREGORY R COPLEY-a.

   Niko od prisutnih „eksperata“ ni raznih „savetnika“ na banjalučkom Pravnom Fakultetu ni da se priseti izveštaja GIS-a o događajima u vreme pada Srebrenice, niti da predloži advokatskim timovima da se kao svedok odbrane haških optuženika Radovana Karažića i generala Mladića pozove obaveštajni ekspert Gregory R Copley koji je jedno vreme tokom rata u BIH u Sarajevu rukovodio Geostrateškim institutom – (GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily) odakle je poslao centrali ISSA desetine objektivnih izvještaja o događajima vezanim za pad Srebrenice u ruke VRS i činjenicama koje su tome prethodile.

   https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/srpska/conversations/messages/15933

   15933ARCHIVE Srebrenica casualty numbers challenged by experts (ISSA, September 18, 2003)

   sibercor2000

   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/srpska/message/15003

   The International Strategic Studies Association (ISSA)

   BALKAN & EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN POLICY COUNCIL

   PO Box 20407, Alexandria, Virginia 22320, USA
   Telephone (703) 548-1070.
   Facsimile (703) 684-7476.
   Website: http://www.StrategicStudies.org.

   Contact: Gregory Copley, 703-548-1070

   FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

   Srebrenica Casualty Numbers Challenged by Experts as Politicized and Ethnically Divisive

   WASHINGTON, DC, September 18, 2003: On the eve of the dedication of a monument to Muslims killed at Srebrenica, in Bosnia-Herzegovina, in
   1995, a group which includes a former UN official, intelligence experts, and journalists, released a statement challenging the alleged casualty number of 7,000 victims as „vastly inflated and unsupported by evidence“.

   They asserted that one-sided interventionist policies permitted al-Qaida forces and radical Islamists backed by the Iranian clerical government to take root during the Bosnian war, clouding the future of the region.
   As well, they agreed that the „memorialization“ of false numbers in the monument actually appeared to be intended to perpetuate regional ethnic hatred and distrust and to deliberately punish one of the victim groups in the Bosnian civil war. Former US President Bill Clinton is expected to attend and legitimize the dedication of the monument at Srebrenica, which was constructed using one million dollars of US Embassy funds at the request of High Representative Paddy Ashdown. But former BBC journalist Jonathan Rooper, who has researched the events in Srebrenica since 1995, says that the region was a graveyard for Serbs as well as Muslims and that a monument to inflated casualties on one side „serves neither truth nor the goal of reconciliation“.

   Phillip Corwin, former UN Civilian Affairs Coordinator in Bosnia during the 1990s, said: „What happened in Srebrenica was not a single large
   massacre of Muslims by Serbs, but rather a series of very bloody attacks and counterattacks over a three year period which reached a crescendo in July of 1995.“ Mr. Corwin is author of Dubious Mandate, an account of his experiences during the conflict. He points out that Srebrenica, which was designated a safe zone, was never demilitarized as it was claimed to be, and that Muslim paramilitary leader Nasir Oric, who controlled Srebrenica, launched repeated attacks on surrounding Serb villages. He noted: „I was the United Nations“ chief political officer in Bosnia the day that Srebrenica fell. Coincidentally, it was the same day that the Bosnian Government tried to assassinate me as I drove over Mount Igman on the way to Sarajevo.“

   Intelligence expert and strategist Gregory Copley, President of the International Strategic Studies Association and the ISSA’s Balkan &
   Eastern Mediterranean Policy Council, accused US Ambassador Donald Hays, who serves as Deputy High Representative of Bosnia-Herzegovina, of using the power of the Office of the High Representative (OHR) governing Bosnia „to force Bosnian Serb elected officials to sign a fraudulent
   document accepting the official version of events in Srebrenica. The leaders of Republica Srpska [the predominantly Serbian province of
   Bosnia-Herzegovina] invited the office of the High Representative to join their investigation of the events in Srebrenica. Instead they were
   told they were told to sign a statement drafted by OHR endorsing casualty figures they publicly disagreed with.“ Copley added: „It is
   significant in that the former US Clinton Administration fought this war unquestioningly supporting only the Croat and Muslim factions and
   disregarding the historic alliance of the Serbian peoples with the US.
   Then, after the war, the Clinton Administration failed to follow US tradition in helping to heal the wounds of war, but, rather, perpetuated
   ethnic divisions and hatreds. This differs from the US role in all other wars.“

   „Unfortunately, all of the policies and officials put in place in the region by the Clinton Administration remain. The current Bush
   Administration has neglected the Balkans and has, instead, allowed the Clinton policies to continue, which has meant that divisive politics
   continue. This, then, requires the ongoing commitment of US peacekeeping forces in both Bosnia and in the Kosovo province of Serbia.“

   Copley added that, according to intelligence obtained from Islamist sources, that the monument was intended to become a shrine for radical
   Islamists in Europe and site for annual pilgrimages. He added: „Deputy High Representative Donald Hays forced the Republica Srpska Government to issue a statement which accepted the radical Islamists“ version of the Srebrenica affair, despite the fact that the Office of High
   Representative does not have any investigative capability of its own to make a valid assumption on the matter. As well, the International
   Criminal Tribunal on Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague „no friend of the Serbs“ has itself not completed its investigation of Srebrenica, and
   nor has the office of the Government of Republica Srpska which has been working with the ICTY.“

   Amb.. Hays and OHR chief Paddy Ashdown forced the Republica Srpska statement merely to ensure that the opening of the „shrine“ „to be
   attended by Clinton“ would vindicate Clinton Administration policies of support for the radical Islamists.“Yossef Bodansky, who has written
   several books on the war in Yugoslavia and also serves as Research Director of ISSA, calls the 7,000 figure „disinformation“ and notes that
   „all independent forensic evidence points to Muslim casualties in the hundreds, possibly the low hundreds. Continued emphasis on such
   allegedly high numbers of Muslim deaths at Srebrenica also obfuscates the Muslim murders in that city, earlier, of Serb civilians.“ Bodansky
   also wrote extensively on the link between Osama bin Laden and the Bosnian Islamists in numerous articles and special reports and three
   books, including Offensive in the Balkans: the Potential for a Wider War as a Result of Foreign Intervention in Bosnia-Herzegovina (1995), Some Call it Peace: Waiting for War in the Balkans (1996), and Bin Laden: The Man Who Declared War on America (1999).

   Rooper says that at least 1,000 Serbs, mostly civilians, were killed by forces led by Oric who did not bother to hide his crimes, even showing videotapes of slaughtered Serbs to Western journalists. Meanwhile a group of academic experts and journalists from the United States,
   Canada, Germany, France, Serbia, and the United Kingdom has been organized by Professor Edward S. Herman of the University of
   Pennsylvania to examine the evidence regarding events at Srebrenica in July 1995 and earlier, how the media reported these events, and the
   political role of claims about Srebrenica. It is expected that a report from this group will be available in June 2004. Rooper points out that the 40,000 inhabitants the UN used in July of 1995 before the capture of Srebrenica roughly matches the number of former residents accounted for in the aftermath. A commander of the Muslim-dominated Army of BiH (Bosnia-Herzegovina) later confirmed to parliament in Sarajevo that 5,000 BiH troops escaped largely intact to Tuzla while the UN registered some 35,632 civilian survivors.

   While the capture of Srebrenica was reported in July 1995, as it unfolded, an international outcry only took place a month later, after
   Madeleine Albright, then US representative to the UN, held up a photo which she said provided evidence that thousands of Muslim victims had
   been buried at field near Nova Kasaba, 19 kilometers from Srebrenica.
   Excavations which took place following the war, however, yielded 33 bodies at Nova Kasaba. Two years after the event, a total of 400 bodies
   had been found at 20 sites near Srebrenica, an area which had seen bloody fighting over a three year period. Instead of acknowledging that
   there was no support for the original figures, Rooper says a various means were used to prop up the official story.

   „Spokesmen for the Clinton Administration suggested that Serbs might have moved the bodies to other locations. Rooper points out that
   excavating, transporting and reburying 7,000 bodies was „not only beyond the capabilities of the thinly stretched, petrol-starved Bosnian Serb Army, but would have been easily detected under intense surveillance from satellites and geostationary drones.

   By 1998, thousands of bodies excavated from all across Bosnia were stored at the Tuzla airport. Despite state of the art DNA testing, only
   200 bodies have been linked to Srebrenica. Around 3,000 names on a list of Srebrenica victims compiled by the Red Cross matched voters in the Bosnian election in 1996. „I pointed out to the OSCE that there had either been massive election fraud or almost half the people on the ICRC
   missing list were still alive,“ says Rooper. „The OSCE finally responded that the voting lists had been locked away in warehouses and it would not be possible for them to investigate.“

   The inflated Srebrenica statistics are part of a larger picture that intelligence experts such as Bodansky and Copley find troubling. They
   say US policymakers have been slow to recognize that Bosnia is viewed as a strategic base for operations in Europe by al-Qaida and the HizbAllah.
   In 1993, when the Clinton Administration was strongly backing the Muslim President of Bosnia, Alija Izetbegovic, Osama Bin Ladin was regular
   visitor to his office, according to Renate Flottau of the German weekly, Der Spiegel. The Bosnian daily, Dani, reported that the Vienna Embassy of BiH issued a passport to Bin Ladin in 1993.

   A special report by Copley, issued Tuesday, September 16. 2003. noted that Bosnia-Herzegovina Ambassador Huso Zivalj, who issued the passport to Bin Ladin, later served as Bosnian Ambassador to the United Nations in September 11. „It is becoming increasingly clear that the movement of Zivalj to the New York post just before (and his departure just after) the September 11,2001 attacks was not coincidental.“

   „To refer to US Bosnia policy as a success story is to disregard substantial evidence to the contrary. Instead of misplaced symbolism in
   Srebrenica, US policymakers need to take a hard look at assumptions which have guided US actions in the region,“ Copley said.

   /Ends/

   15933ARCHIVE Srebrenica casualty numbers challenged …

   https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/srpska/…/15933

   Website: http://www.StrategicStudies.org. Contact: Gregory Copley, 703-548-1070. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Srebrenica Casualty Numbers Challenged by Experts

   http://www.serbianna.com/columns/jatras/002.shtml
   …
   In another analysis titled, „US Official implicated with Bosnian Representative Ashdown in Attempt to Force Fabricated Report on Srebrenica,“ Gregory R. Copley, with input from sources in Sarajevo and elsewhere, wrote, „Very reliable sources within the Office of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and other sources in Sarajevo have told GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily that a second US official, Amb. Donald S. Hays, the Deputy High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina, has been actively engaged in attempts to force a fabricated report to be published on the controversial wartime fighting at the city of Srebrenica.“

   A representative in the Bosnian and Federal Parliaments, Ibran Mustafic, gave an explosive interview on Aug. 15, 1996, to Slobodna Bosnia („Free Bosnia,“ A Sarajevo newspaper). Mustafic was quoted as saying that the betrayal of Srebrenica „was consciously prepared and that the Bosnian president and the army command were involved in this business,“ and that was to sacrifice Srebrenica in order to gain sympathy of the West. Of his internment in a Serbian jail, he writes, „I should have died. They [the Bosnian Muslim authorities] don’t appreciate living people. They appreciate the dead because they cannot talk.“
   …

   President Bush said after 9/11 that we will do whatever it takes to defend ourselves against the [Muslim] terrorists, yet we denied the Serbs the right to defend themselves against the same enemy that we are fighting today.

   Свиђа ми сеСвиђа ми се